Stardust Global Ventures

Today is July 4th, 2010. Independence Day for those of you who are American or those who know anything about the history of the United States. Independence of what? Hm…that’s not really in debate, but this day and what it means has given me pause. Why? Because I’m about to embark on a new path that leaves me decidedly not independent, or does it? Let’s think about this.
Ken and I have been partnered for nearly 3 years. After these years of partnership we have finally decided to legalize ‘us’ as a couple. We have the marriage license, have a minister, our attendants/witnesses are ready to arrive for the big day. What about my 3 year long independence? Does a ceremony mean independence is no longer possible? Am I now to be absorbed or will I remain independent and a separate entity inside a partnership?  What is Independence?

Webster’s dictionary defines independence like this: 1 : the quality or state of being independent .

When you look up independent, here is what you get: 1 : not dependent: as a (1) : not subject to control by others : self-governing (2) : not affiliated with a larger controlling unit <an independent bookstore> b (1) : not requiring or relying on something else : not contingent <an independent conclusion> (2) : not looking to others for one’s opinions or for guidance in conduct

Independence means I have the right and ability to choose what I stand for, what I’d like to do and who I’d like to do it with. Independence means my opinions will still be my own, I will not have to give up what I believe or think for anyone else.

What independence doesn’t mean is that the past no longer exists or that we relinquish all of who we were prior. Nor does it mean we become whole only inside the marriage. It simply provides a point of reference for what we stand for. Isn’t that what independence day in America is? I stand for me, I support my family and I support my soon to be husband. I remain Independent.

Happy Independence Day, friends and colleagues.

We hope you will join us in thought: Thursday, July 22nd, 2010 at 4pm pdt as we celebrate our Independence as a couple. Media will follow. (We are the first couple in technology after all)

Location based services (LBS) are all the rage today. From Foursquare to Gowalla to Yelp and more, the ability to check in, network and share tips via smartphones has captivated the attention of early adopters worldwide.

For those of us who live each day by our smartphones, that’s great, but we’re still in the minority.  There are far more standard mobile phones worldwide that smartphones. And while momentum is increasing, standard cell phones will continue to dominate the global market in many parts of the world.

Even with smartphones, there’s another aspect to location that technology can improve and automate – indoor positioning. A few months back Kevin Tofel wrote on GigaOm about a company that’s been working on patent pending location both indoors and underground to from 1-40 meters. As good as or better than GPS…for any cell phone – even those not equipped with GPS.

That’s right, with solid triangulation algorithms Aunt Suzy’s old flip phone can be located accurately too.

Here’s some info from a current press release:

GloPos, the developer of a breakthrough software-only positioning technology that makes all mobile phones location aware — outdoors, indoors, and even underground – has confirmed an indoor positioning accuracy of 7.7 to 12.5 meters in an independent test of its software conducted by VTT, The Technical Research Center of Finland.

Testing of the outdoor, indoor and underground accuracy of GloPos software was conducted by VTT at the Helsinki City Center on May 20, 2010. The GloPos application ran on a standard GSM-only mobile phone.

The stationary indoor and underground tests show that GloPos is capable of non-filtered average positioning accuracy of 15.1-23.9 meters. 75% of the measurements present an average position accuracy of 7.7-12.5 meters. With filtering, the indoor accuracy of GloPos technology is as good as the outdoor accuracy in an urban environment with a normal GPS embedded in mobile phones. When comparing with state-of-the-art cell positioning (Google Maps) the average accuracy is at least two times better and in some cases even ten times better (indoors).

“This successful test lays the groundwork for making all mobile phones location aware and opens up exciting, new opportunities in the personal navigation, social location, mobile search and personalized mobile advertising marketplaces,” said Mikael Vainio, CEO.

For those who remember Jaiku at its peak, location based on tower triangulation was becoming very important. It allowed a user created database of locations that Jaiku users with Nokia phones and the client software could then tag locations for future use.

That’s right, the model behind Foursquare and Gowalla was in live use with Jaiku long ago. The GloPos value really stems from honing accuracy for handsets that aren’t GPS-enabled. Remember those handsets are still SMS enabled. SMS is hugely popular and widely used.

We don’t talk about text a lot these days, but in 2008, in the US we sent 95.4 billion text messages. And we aren’t big text users. Many countries make optimum use of the lowest common denominator handset.

The truth is the Internet and value we get from it is really strongest when we support the the most basic end device – a standard cell phone.

GloPos potentially enables more granular location tagging that we see today in LBS. We can identify location not just to the store inside the mall, but which floor of the store someone is in.

GloPos makes location more important that ever in the mobile marketplace. it’s more ubiquitous than the other technologies we use today.

GloPos technology requires only a cellular network to make all mobile phones location aware. No additional hardware like GPS or W-LAN is required on a mobile device for achieving accurate positioning.

GloPos’ patent-pending, self learning algorithms can calculate an accurate position fix even in places where no W-LAN access points are available or no GPS can be used (i.e. in shopping malls, subways, underground parking, airports, sports arenas, exhibition centers). GloPos works wherever cellular network coverage is available.

GloPos Technology does not consume any extra battery life while operating as cell information is already being used to stay connected. GloPos enables longer device usage versus GPS and W-LAN, allowing battery power to be used for more advanced applications and driving more powerful processors.

We’re really just beginning to uncover the power and the value of location. Companies like GloPos are going to keep emerging as they bring new strengths to what we can do with technology we carry in our hands already.

My blogging here has been much lighter than in the past. It isn’t because I’ve lost interest in VoIP, unified communications or mobility. Theyve simply become smaller facets of what I’ve been working on and thinking about. I’ve become deeply entrenched in the realities and vision of real next generation networks in the large enterprise space.

With deference and utmost respect for many friends and colleagues in the entrepreneurial space, much of the innovation we see today really targets the SMB (small-medium business) space rather than large enterprise. This is true for a number of reasons. SMB and enterprise business share a number of issues that differ only in scale. Enterprise business has unique requirements beyond scale. These might relate to requirements from regulatory agencies, business sectors, shareholders, Wall Street and global business realities. They are  very different animals, and this fact is often overlooked but high tech innovators. (See my recent post Skype in the Enterprise? Not without major changes for one example.)

For example, small businesses are looking at Google Voice, Skype and other VoIP services for their use. Large enterprise tends to look at carrier class services differently. Most enterprises source telecom and network services selectively from a small set of providers. Some will select more, some fewer. This is to reduce risk and force price competition among the providers. Other companies focus intently on the “one throat to choke” approach, insisting on a single provider

Enterprise 2.0 (E20) is a very popular buzz phrase today. I see the current state of E20 and what we call cloud computing as being very transitional to a more interesting destination from the large enterprise perspective. Let’s touch on where we’re at and where we’re headed beyond E20.

Today the enterprise looks for things like:

• Cost models that are flexible, break out all the different service elements and deliver consolidated billing.
• Shifting from per seat and per port costs to more demand or usage oriented billing.
• Tiered SLAs are becoming increasingly important.
• Network based, or hosted in the cloud based services are on the rise, particularly in the realms of VoIP, unified communications and collaboration (UCC) and call centers. Hosted in the cloud doesn’t necessarily mean by a service provider. Enterprise businesses are leading with private cloud hosting delivered by the enterprise today. It’s a bit movement.

Cloud based service really fall into three distinct categories today.

• Public cloud owned by the carrier with access via the Internet
• Community cloud hosted or managed by the carrier, shared by a consortium of organizations. This is typically accessed via the Internet or via VPN.
• Private cloud hosted by either a carrier or the enterprise itself.

Enterprise business really wants a hybrid of many clouds for load balancing, traffic bursting that mix these three models.

Software as a Service (SaaS) is a leading driver of cloud initiatives today. Whether is moving sales force automation (SFA), enterprise resource planning (ERP) or customer relationship management (CRM) to the cloud, there’s really one fundamental technology that enables this – virtualization. Server virtualization is big business. What we have today is maturation of virtualization technologies. The industry spins it as cloud computing but this is really only the first steps to a fully enabled cloud.

Communications as a Service (CaaS) is a growing trend. Leveraging VoIP, video and collaboration services (UCC), CaaS brings in call centers, conferencing, messaging and fixed mobile convergence. CaaS is an infant in the enterprise today. The best in breed solutions are built, run and maintained by the enterprise, for the enterprise. These are not solution any carrier can deliver as cloud based services today.

The next generation is something the carriers should be frightened of. It changes their business completely. I’ve long argued that Telco 2.0 was something of an oxymoron. Here’s one reason I believe this.

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is a pretty new concept to be spoken aloud. It’s something enterprise architects have talked about for years behind closed doors. Now it’s something these architects are pushing toward providers. In a short time, it will become the de facto operating model telcos and other providers will have to operate under to win business. This will be a critical extinction event for many providers.

In the future that I’m loathe to call Enterprise 3.0, IaaS will be delivered by the real next generation carrier-class provider. It will bring some major differentiators that create an obvious gap from todays model.

• Carriers will provide more options on how services are billed and paid for. The idea of a fixed cost circuit will die, replaced with unbilled capacity (bandwidth) billed against usage, with some minimal billing requirement.
  • Enterprise organizations will routinely deploy 5-10 Gigabit capacity connections to support high demand as streaming apps grow more widespread. They can’t do that today because the billing for these circuits 24X7 simply precludes it as an option.
• Carrier neutrality will be a reality. This means carriers will have to interoperate, provide on-demand capabilities, and deliver on their SLAs like never before.
  • This environment will give the enterprise access circuits for the last mile, with flexible, on demand switching at the provider edge. If the carrier in use suffers a major outage, switching to an alternate carrier will be simple and seamless, even transparent.
  • This neutrality will make carrier services much like power brokerage in the energy sector today. Large businesses may even shift traffic day-to-day based on available pricing from carriers. Transport will truly become a utility.
• More enterprises will tackle co-management and self provisioning of the enterprise network and cloud. That’s right. More DIY in the enterprise because only the large enterprise truly understands and can meet their service delivery requirements.

These are some of the thing I’m working on lately. They are coming. In some cases they’re here in pilots, prototypes and trials. If you think the tech sector has been interesting so far, hang on for an exciting ride ahead in the enterprise space.

The last few days I’ve seen several posts talking abut how Skype is now going to run rampant through the enterprise world. While some posts were from people I know and respect, those folks are simply off the mark.

I know we love Skype. I love Skype. For personal use. But as an enterprise architect with thirty years experience (in the large enterprise), it’s not going in my network. And ongoing discussions with my colleagues in network and security fields confirm Skype isn’t showing up in their networks either. The common response remains “not on my watch.”

The popular opinion that Skype will take over the enterprise is widely held, but I’d call it an urban myth. Popular because we love Skype. Popular because we love free. The notion is particularly popular among entrepreneurs and startup visionaries. In their business it does make good sense. But they aren’t designing, operating, maintaining or securing an enterprise business network. Many of them have never worked in that environment, and simply don’t grasp the ramifications.

There isn’t one single reason. This isn’t a problem that one change in Skype will fix.

First and foremost, the heritage of Skype will always be Kazaa. The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) of every enterprise is going to remember that for a long time. It isn’t just P2P, it’s the DNA Skype was formed from. We’re three generations of CISOs away from embracing the core of Skype and forgetting the heritage.

Second, there are zero business controls. None. For enterprise business to adopt Skype, the whole supernode architecture will have to change dramatically. Clients will have to be pointed at a specific supernode or set of supernodes. And the client can’t ever be promoted or escalated into a supernode. In essence, the supernode of today will have to be more like a PBX with configuration and management controls that don’t exist today. And the client will have to be revamped to provide controls that also don’t exist.

Third, the encryption deployed in Skype positively precludes it from enterprise adoption. Key escrow doesn’t exist. The algorithm is a black box. Enterprise business can’t buy a magic black box. HIPAA, SOX, ITAR, and a host of other regulations require audit and configuration controls that simply don’t exist. Some organization must either have and document or submit to third party key management systems that Skype  doesn’t use, support, or from all I’ve seen, even acknowledge.

There are several more sound business reasons, but I won’t prattle on endlessly. I think I’ve made my point.

Skype is a renegade telco. As consumers, we love that. We’re ebullient about it. But praise gone wild sounds like technologists deluding themselves into thinking an enterprise that isn’t using Skype is being foolhardy. The opposite is true. An enterprise business has to protect shareholder value and make sound business choices about technology.

There are two phrases that come to mind. There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch (TANSTAAFL) and you get what you pay for. Both are applicable to enterprise adoption of Skype.

Enterprise business simply can’t afford Skype, at free, or at any price in its current design. The enterprise value proposition simply isn’t there, no matter how much many of my friends and colleagues might wish it.

Don’t mistake the enterprise passing on Skype for being backwards or slighting VoIP. VoIP is big and growing in the enterprise, although not quite as quickly as industry pundits proclaim. But it’s growing globally and will continue to accelerate in deployment.

Skype,  on the other hand, is at least 4-5 technology generations from being the right fit for enterprise business. And to get there will require Skype hiring the right people, and listening to the real-world requirements of the enterprise from people who design, operate, maintain and secure those large networks. I haven’t heard anyone in that space say they’ve had any discussions with Skype. And none of the leading architects, designers and developers of real enterprise scale voice services have been in the “just moved to Skype” news that I’ve seen.

I’ll preface this by stating the obvious. I’ve yet to drink the koolaid, but I do have an opinion.

I’ve been reading all the glowing warm fuzzies from many colleagues and friends proclaiming Skype’s new 3G call support as perhaps the greatest innovation from mankind since Jonas Salk gave us a vaccine for polio. Or something akin to that.

I’m more critical. I’m also more grounded in enterprise business than most of the folks I’ve read effusive praise from. Then again, Skype over WiFi from a mobile is barely, mildly interesting, if nearly useless IMHO. I’ve made two mobile Skype test calls since switching to the iPhone a few months ago. They were ok. They were phone calls. They worked. I have no reason to make more.

I’ll grant that allowing Skype to run in multitasking mode on the iPhone could make it mildly more interesting. Again, mildly IMHO. A Skype phone that has to be front and center in a mobile computer (what the iPhone really is) is an impediment to productivity, not an aid.

But, I’m working to keep an open mind here. I really am. So people who buy the most expensive, top-of-the-line phone, and pay for unlimited data, can’t afford enough minutes to make a phone call? Or do they call a high volume of minutes overseas? I never run over the minutes I pay for. The rollover bank is full of more. But I can understand the need for Skype for international calling.

What I don’t understand is what percentage of Skype users see this as so necessary. What percentage has to have this capability over 3G because they’re never at their computers? Sure, I know a few business people who live on international travel and would find this quite helpful. That they’re in a position to afford the calls at going rates doesn’t matter. They want them free on an all-you-can-eat data plan. Ok, I get that.

What percentage of Skype’s user base is this service aimed at? Not my jet-setter colleagues and friends who live in frequent flier clubs and spend their time hopping from conference to dinner to conference to meetup. I’m talking about everyman – the user that made Skype the behemoth it believes itself to be.

I just looked at Skype and according to my client, there are currently 12,665,667 people online. 12 million people, and I’m guessing that a miniscule percentage of those people are mobile. And a miniscule percentage need 3g HD Voice on a cell phone.

So where’s the beef?

Oh wait, I know my friends and colleagues will jump up to say “but have you heard it?” Did you hear that amazing HD quality?  On that I have two thoughts. One backed by facts and the reality of the telecom world. The other is just my opinion.

It’s a fact that callers won’t pay for audio quality. Ask Sprint how those “You can hear a pin drop” ads are doing. I can tell you the pin drop on stage in the Mormon Tabernacle in Salt Lake City is far more effective and impressive. If callers cared about call quality, the PSTN with it’s wired landlines wouldn’t be in a death spiral as users go for portability, mobility and ubiquity. We won’t buy audio quality and we’ve proven that with 140 years of  telecommunications in North American. Buying patterns don’t lie.

As for my opinion, let me ask a question – how do you spend your time on the phone? Mine is spent in two ways. I spend a bit of time on phone calls with people I know – customers, colleagues, family and friends. None of us ever have issue with the fidelity of a call. I also spend an inordinate amount of time on conference calls.

If you’re in conference call hell, do you give a rabbit’s fart about getting better audio quality? Be honest. If you’re on a computer, this 3g smokescreen isn’t a factor. You’re doing email and other work while you’re on the call. And if you’re mobile, you’re driving, or doing something else as well.

Again, where’s the beef? Improved audio quality during conference calls is somewhat  akin to my dentist playing nicer music during a root canal. I’d prefer to change the experience in a more compelling way.

Sure you can tell me the SILK codec is wonderful and we’re early adopters and this is a taste of the future. Maybe, but I don’t think it’s a 3G future. I think it’s perhaps 4G version 2.0 at best before most callers will notice or care.

On the other hand, what problem is it solving? More 3G footprint? Better coverage? Reduced cost? Options? I don’t think so.

Skype 3G HD voice calling is a solution without a problem. It’s hype too far ahead of the curve. it’s a proof of concept without a market. And to me, that makes it just a tad boring.

Skype has been an innovator and disruptor. Note I said “has been” in the past tense. This isn’t terribly innovative. It isn’t the least bit disruptive. It is the sound of a bell ringing. It’s the bell heralding Skype as Telco 2.0. Not AT&T. Not Verizon. Not Qwest. Not BT. Not Telstra. Skype is the first to become Telco 2.0.

That may be a good thing, and it may not. Your mileage may vary. But don’t mistake it for innovative disruption of an industry that’s still ripe for real reinvention. And real reinvention will send all the carriers scurrying for safe ground.

Currently I am playing with the 64 GB 3G version of the iPad I won at the RSA Conference in San Francisco thanks to Tripwire. The features are very nice. The screen is crystal clear, although a little hard to see in the sunlight. It works well on wireless for videos and web browsing. Unfortunately for me, the AT&T coverage in my area is not 3G so not worth the 2 offered plans currently available. But… “How do you get around this” you ask. That is simple. Turn your phone into a wireless access point through various means of apps, hacking, or whatever. I used an app on my HTC Touch Pro 2 carried by US Cellular (3G locally now, ) and now have 3G access to the iPad via wireless through my phone. The best part is that it’s not really tethering so you don’t need the associated plan.

So with that the iPad is great. In my area I don’t need the 3G so I might sell it and get two of the standard wireless ones cause my wife loves it too. The apps, the games, and the possibilities, all right there at your multi-touch finger tips.

Until now I didn’t like Apple. Not because I grew up on PC’s. No. Just because I didn’t know them as well as I know PC’s. But after 2 weeks with the iPad I’m definitely a fan of the iPad and it’s possibilities with future releases. I hope to do more testing and possible a run with the AT&T 3G as it is available in a town about 30 miles away form me.

Just a quicky to consider the latest twitter bug as referenced on Mashable.

What do you think would happen if our numbers ceased to show, permanently? What would the so-called guru’s base their expertise on? Better yet, how would they set themselves apart? What would happen to the social media we have a love/hate relationship with?

I’d really love to find out. Hm….I wonder.

Just got through reading one of Robert Scoble’s opinion pieces on privacy. He makes some good points but more than that, it made me consider just what it is that most of us really mean when we talk about privacy. Have a look at his post and then let’s talk. http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/08/much-ado-about-privacy-on-facebook-are-we-protesting-too-much/

I don’t necessarily always agree with Robert but he definitely makes me think. I don’t think a locked down website is what most people want from Facebook. I know that’s not what I want. It is what everyone says they want, but maybe we should ask ourselves to really consider that. I think we want something else entirely.

You all know I’m female. Like it or not females are addressed by a certain segment of the world population differently than males are. While it doesn’t happen often, I have certainly had my share of requests for friendship by people who send a message telling me I’m ‘hot’ or asking for my IM so they can contact me directly. Usually they want me to use Yahoo, which sort of tells me something must be in yahoo I am not privy to because while I have a yahoo account for Flickr, I do not use yahoo.

So with these experiences, and a long term account on Facebook as well as a long term life online, it caused me to really think about what I would like on the web regarding privacy.

I want control of who has the ability to communicate with me. That’s all. I want people to treat their online neighbors as they would their next door neighbors and not expect they have the right to write derogatory things on their ‘walls’ or send mail that is inappropriate. I don’t want strange men or women to publicly hit on me, I do not want them to come to my place of business, ie email, linked in messages, blog, or wherever else i may be conducting business to ‘call me out’ like a high school bully. I expect to be treated on my public spaces the way I would were we in the same physical space. With dignity and respect. I think typing has emboldened us for some reason and I think we should step back and really consider when we all got the right to be mean and insensitive to one another.

I have recently had to block someone on Facebook. I blocked them because they were sending messages I don’t appreciate receiving. It’s not that I care if they see my profile, I only choose to not receive messages from them because they apparently struggle with the common courtesy I talked about above.

Since I’m writing this on my iPhone, I’ll end now. But think about it. Is it really privacy or simply some measure of control that has been missing from online life?

A while back Tom Foremski wrote a post called – Dirty Little Secrets: Social Media Is Terrible at Promoting Products.

I have thought about that and he’s right. Social media promotes social media, or to take it deeper, Social media is what companies use to promote themselves. But no one is successfully promoting a product with social media. What social media is doing is enabling communication.

Are Brands social? I don’t think so. We pay attention to brands because of cultivated credibility. People brands may be social, but typically by the time they reach recognizable brand status they are not nearly as social because they are too busy and bombarded, so people brands find the other people like them, and are social there. It no longer matters that they aren’t social because they have built enough credibility that WOM takes over and becomes all that matters. Even bad word of mouth rarely impacts them. Most treat that as sour grapes.

As a people brand grows, does social shifting happen where they no longer have to engage because the people who built and helped them now do all the ‘social’ for them? Is it asynchronous – where you, the brand, no longer have to be involved? I believe this to be the case.

Is the assumption that by having 100k + followers that you have then achieved such a state of brand identity you are no longer required to engage? How then do we maintain credibility? We don’t expect the products to jump off the market shelves at us as we walk through a store, why then should a people brand expect and get unconditional devotion? Do they now have whuffie, or karma to spare and other people perpetuate their brand for us?

I’d like to not confuse a Brand with Engagement. Engagement happens between people looking for something, be it friendship, products, or information, and those providing what we’re looking for. The best engagers are not the brands we already identify. Those brands have all become part of the old broadcast media mold. No, the best engagers are people who haven’t yet arrived. Hmmm, I wonder if that’s an argument for high turnover in social media? I think I’ll save that for another post.

Who of you have not heard some major brand tell you, “We listen and we respond”, only to ask a question and either get nothing in response, or get the canned response that they will respond as soon as possible but due to the massive number of requests it may take a while? Is this what we want from engagement? Can we even call this engagement? I think this is LAME!

What we want from engagement is a front facing contact, someone who is representative of the brand, not the brand, who will take the time to help us out. We don’t want someone identified as a brand because as soon as we identify a person as a brand, they have reached a status that defeats the purpose of the front facing person. A brand simply doesn’t have enough to give to that many people. Certainly not the engagement piece.

Brian Solis recently wrote the book, Engage: The complete guide for Brands and Businesses to Build, Cultivate, and Measure Success in the New Web. I haven’t personally read this book, in part because I have not had an opportunity, but there is another piece to it. I don’t think Brian engages well, except with those in his immediate universe, and I find it incredibly difficult to get excited enough to buy a book that is supposed to teach engagement from someone who is now his own brand. Certainly Brian is successful, you really can’t argue that, but why is he successful when he doesn’t eat his own dogfood? I believe Brian is successful because he has reached that brand status that many wish to reach, and yet so few ever truly achieve. But reaching that status now means he is incapable of being a person and truly engaging the way most social media people engage – which illustrates my point.

This isn’t a piece on Brian, and I’d rather not make it about him which is why I’m only linking to his book, not to him on a personal level. He is merely an example of the big picture I’m trying to paint, certainly not the only example, just a good one.

Once upon a time most Brands paid attention, asking questions about how they could do better, or what they should do differently, or even how to make your experience better. Once they get to the royalty stage, the only thing that shakes a brand up is a need to combat bad press, in other words the need to defend themselves.

You are certainly capable of making up your own mind about all this. I just had some thoughts, and where better to put them than here?

On a final note I’ll end with something I saw on twitter just moments before posting this. Practice what you preach, better yet, don’t preach. Just practice!

Makes sense, don’t you think? If you aren’t living it, walking the walk so to speak, at some point people will notice.

Technorati Tags: Tom Foremski, Sheryl Breuker, Brian Solis, Personal Brand, Engagement,

Every parent, teacher, educator and administrator in the world should watch this video. Twice. Then they should have to take a test.

This is the single most compelling talk from the recent 140Conf.

Our kids ARE the foundation that we’re building the world on. We don’t need drones and workers. We need thinkers and doers. Achievers and explorers. We need to teach our children to create, collaborate, build and network.

We need to do it now!

Don’t just shrug this off. Watch it. Share it. Spread the word. And teach your children well. Then teach help mentor three other children.

Almost a year ago, I wrote about Ten Tremendous Twitter Ideas in Part 1 and Part 2. Here’s what I said about one idea:

Telemetry – That’s a broad brush sector, but let me provide an example or two for consideration. Consider the utility services we use – gas, water and electric. As children, most of us remember the meter reader who came around each month with a clipboard taking manual readings from the various meters. In the utility industry, these are called “consumption reads.” They’re vital to utility providers for billing purposes.

That method of reading utility meters has been obsoleted by technology. First meters were equipped with small radio transmitters that could send meter readings to a person walking down the sidewalk. This innovation led to increased efficiency. Meter readers were able to gather many more readings in a day. But this advance quickly moved from a handheld data collection device to something mounted in a vehicle. The territory a person can cover driving led to another huge efficiency increase.

Both these methods are very common today, yet they’re being rapidly obsoleted by the ideas of both fixed and wireless networking. By placing data collectors on utility poles, buildings, and other infrastructure, now meter readings can easily be gathered in real-time, using network technologies, for homes in a half-mile or greater radius. Today, two-way functionality in utility meters is an area of keen interest for utility companies.

This technology today uses combined technologies. For example, from the meter to the pole-mounted collector something like 900Mhz unregulated spectrum may be used. The collector devices then might use GPRS or 3G to send some upstream IP information to a network aggregation point. This requires the integration of cellular modem technology into the collector.

Since we’re talking about embedded chipset technologies, why put the expensive data radio in the collector device. Why not embed a cellphone chipset and enable an SMS-only account with the carriers. The utility sector wields termendous power with the carriers, but sadly they do not know how to flex their muscles very well. Cost reduction in an emerging technology using Twitter technology to transmit information that is not so critical it requires more costly networking. It’s simply utility utilization monitoring in very-near real-time, (VNRT).

Many telemetry and flow metering applications use simple text messages over a serial interface. In the information age, we can easily replace the old wired serial link with an SMS stream of tweets.

Of course the utility won’t want to use the public Twitter for this information stream. All that’s needs is some partnering and selling.building a custom infrastructure to support it. Voila, a revenue stream for a corporate Twitter product let’s call it ConEdTwit for sake of example using a massive utility company.

The other day I got am email message from Art Felgate about the first first
idea I listed and how he’s building a simple Sewage Lift Station
Alert.  The product also includes a built-in temperature sensor as
well as PIR motion sensor option.

The Microtel Tweet Alert is simply a portable cellular temperature alarm that tweets. It has passed FCC Part 15 Class B and is patent pending.  It joins the family of devices Microtel delivers.

Art told me:

I think the idea of using Advertiser-sponsored Tweets to subsidize the cellular costs could eliminate any monthly costs for the consumer. If our device detected a freeze condition at a vacant cabin, for example, the Tweet could include an Ad/coupon from Home Depot or a local hardware store. Most likely some HVAC equipment failed, so the ad could be relevant to the repair.

The City of San Francisco is accepting Tweets from citizens alerting staff to utility or road incidents. We think a device like ours could complement that effort by monitoring unseen areas/assets.

This past week, with the acquisition of Tweetie, there’s been quite a brouhaha about Twitter and developers/ The developer community that’s most visible is in a panic that Twitter will consume their market niche. They should be concerned.

Microtel, on the other hand, should not. This is a great example of developers and solution providers not looking to add value to Twitter’s existing services. That will always be a risky proposition.

Microtel is simply using the Twitter service for what it really is, an information delivery service. Yes, we could call it transport…a pipe…yes, plumbing.

I was tickled to get Art’s message, and I’m thrilled to see a company like Microtel leading the way into the next generation of what could easily become the next generation of smart devices. And the real value here is that, while Twitter is the transport of choice for the moment, these devices are using simple technology that could easily be flipped to use any number of similar services.

They can also be easily coupled into location based services to provide service maps via common mapping tools to deliver extensive monitoring tools over time.

Kudos to Art and Microtel. I hope you guys see great success with this and keep me posted. Congrats on demonstrating real-world creativity in implementing our evolving tools in new ways.

From time to time, I’ve read tweets from @ajleon. Tonight I followed and subscribed to his because he said something that’s one of the key messages many of us have been talking about for a long time. He just said it with a a story that resonated.

First go read A Tale of Two Starbucks. Go ahead and do it now. It will open a new window and you can come back. We’ll talk briefly about the lesson.

That’s important. Think of it as the 11th commandment. And it cuts in more than one direction.

We’re all active in social media and many people talk about managing our personal brands. The truth goes far deeper.

You own your brand. You own your employer’s brand. You own your client’s brand.

Your employees also own your brand. Your consultants, partners, marketing and PR agencies own your brand too.

I read a number of people talking about businesses controlling social media. So many of the so-called experts out there to day are glib and easy with pronouncements that corporate control of social media is bordering on evil.

Earlier we watched an old movie called Identity Theft. It was the tale of a young woman’s experience with having her identity stolen and her reputation destroyed.

In AJ’s story, Starbuck’s identity, their brand, was given willingly to a woman who ruined it. Ruined their brand. Fortunately another Starbuck’s employee may have saved that reputation for AJ.

A tale of two Starbuck’s may be a tale of two messages. One positive, one negative.

It begs a question of all the social media experts out there. You know, you people who know it all and pronoucegood vs. evil. You solo entrepreneurs who’ve never actually worked for a large business, but have all the answers.

Do you protect your identity information? Are you cautious about identity theft?

Would you advise your business client to leap right out in harms way and allow all employees….de facto custodians of their identity and brand without seriously considering policies and the ramifications? I know many of you espouse just that.

I say to businesses, be circumspect in running your business. Be smart.

Many posts I’ve read lately, events that have taken place and online conversations led me to consider this again. It feels like a good time to remind myself, and I share this self-reminder with you all.

All I really need to know about how to live and what to do and how to be I learned in kindergarten. Wisdom was not at the top of the graduate school mountain, but there in the sand pile at school.

These are the things I learned:

• Share everything.
• Play fair.
• Don’t hit people.
• Put things back where you found them.
• Clean up your own mess.
• Don’t take things that aren’t yours.
• Say you’re sorry when you hurt somebody.
• Wash your hands before you eat.
• Flush.
• Warm cookies and cold milk are good for you.
• Live a balanced life – learn some and think some and draw and paint and sing and dance and play and work every day some.
• Take a nap every afternoon.
• When you go out in the world, watch out for traffic, hold hands and stick together.
• Be aware of wonder. Remember the little seed in the Styrofoam cup: the roots go down and the plant goes up and nobody really knows how or why, but we are all like that.
• Goldfish and hamsters and white mice and even the little seed in the Styrofoam cup – they all die. So do we.
• And then remember the Dick-and-Jane books and the first word you learned – the biggest word of all – LOOK.

Everything you need to know is in there somewhere. The Golden Rule and love and basic sanitation. Ecology and politics and equality and sane living.

Take any one of those items and extrapolate it into sophisticated adult terms and apply it to your family life or your work or government or your world and it holds true and clear and firm. Think what a better world it would be if we all – the whole world – had cookies and milk at about 3 o’clock in the afternoon and then lay down with our blankies for a nap. Or if all governments had as a basic policy to always put things back where they found them and to clean up their own mess.

And it is still true, no matter how old you are, when you go out in the world, it is best to hold hands and stick together.

[From All I Really Needed to Know I Learned in Kindergarten by Robert Fulghum.  http://www.robertfulghum.com/ ]

The “experts” whoever they are, can’t teach us any more about the basic principles of good conduct and civil behavior. They can explain the tools, but we already have the basics.

I spotted this from our friend @sass on Twitter some time ago and it left me thinking a bit. It was one of those thought chains I wanted to let percolate for a while before I was ready to share my ideas on the subject. I also had to think about it so I could make this a short post, rather than a wordy one.

It left me contemplating markets of different kinds, and it seems postworthy. It hearkens back to conversations around The Innovators Dilemma in several ways.

Shrinking Markets
I agree with Jeff’s tweet shown above. Incumbents, as a rule, won’t chase shrinking markets. Why would they? The incumbent, as a rule, doesn’t chase any market. They are the de facto leader in their space and to expend effort to maintain something driven by inertia would simply erode profit margin. There is no perceived value to an incumbent chasing a shrinking market.

Wired residential phone lines are a good example of a shrinking market today.

Stable Markets
Stable markets also have incumbents, but upstarts are also constantly trying to break in and take business away. I don’t think incumbents pursue stable markets either. Stable markets are the kingdom of cronyism and the good old boys. In a stable market, nobody ever got fired for buying IBM…or Cisco…or name your 800 pound gorilla. That doesn’t keep upstarts from trying, but they are fighting an uphill battle.

General networking is a very stable market today. The market for switches, routers and infrastructure isn’t seeing volatile change at a steady pace.

Growth Markets
Growth markets represent potential. My experience in enterprise business is that the big name players see growth markets as what they term green field opportunities. They see opportunity, and they believe they are dominant (perhaps even omnipotent) in a way that assures them market success.

There are two areas I see as this sort of growth market today – unified communications and cloud computing. And some of the biggest names we know are out there proclaiming a message that comes for their belief they dominate. The message isn’t coming from innovation, R&D, new creation or enlightenment. They see an opportunity they think can be converted into relatively low hanging fruit, and they’re interested in grabbing that money before anyone else does.

Emerging Markets
This is the hotbed of startups, innovators and entrepreneurs. Incumbents don’t play here either. The real key is which ones are they actively ignoring or denigrating. That’s where the hottest opportunity lies. That’s the disruptive technology that will put the behemoth in its grave because they don’t have the vision to see that possibility.

It’s not the size of the market, but the power that’s in it.

What’s in your market?

We’ve been keenly interested in the power of Location Based Services (LBS) for quite some time. Early on Jaiku provided some LBS functionality supported on Nokia phones via cell tower triangulation. Then the mighty Google purchased and all but kiled Jaiku. Brightkite provided an LBS a la Twitter interface that gave insight into why we might really want to use LBS, but has proven pretty user intensive, so the return on effort never led to adoption reaching critical mass.

Google introduced Latitude, which opened all sort of new potential. I wrote Giving Google a bit of Latitude on TheNextWeb back in February of 2009.

Today LBS is a hot topic, but it has a very limited adoption rate and user audience. While location baser services like Foursquare and Gowalla dominate conversation at events like SxSWi, the draw is first and foremost for mobile geeks in the tech sector and for tech-oriented events. We might observe that the greatest use of these tools today so that the Digerati/Twitterati web celebs (@Scobleizer and others in that visibility sphere) share their location so fawning hordes of fans can come touch the robes of the elite. That’s not the only use, but perhaps the biggest and most visible use today. There’s nothing monetizable in those egos, and there is no sustainability.

Secondarily, people in both business and technology are intrigued by the technology, using LBS tools to drive serendipity. The ability to share location in real-time can lead to chance meetings, for business and pleasure in a very personal and human way. Connecting with a client, colleague or friend by chance at a coffee shop, restaurant or Home Depot is a personal encounter. People buy from people, and this humanized and personalized connection through emerging tools builds a bond and forges a sort of alliance between people that we’re only beginning to appreciate.

Sheryl and I use these services extensively to check-in because we’re business and technology leaders in our community, and heavily engaged in the global tech sector. That means friends around the world know when we’ve checked in at Walla Walla Java Hut. For people in our community, they’ll also know that we’re friends of the owners, Brad and Cameo. They know we’re likely to be there chatting for a while and they can stop by to say hi, have coffee, ask a question. In short, we’ve made it easy for colleagues, clients and others to be in touch with us. We use LBS to lower the barrier to access.

This is a conscious choice, and for us carries a high value. We are social, and we value interaction and engagement. We’re also focused on our work, and use tools to leverage our strengths and our value. We think this is important.

That said, the tools of today are in their infancy. And the ones mentioned are not the only tools of today, or of next week. Google Latitude is still alive and well. Yelp provides an LBS oriented yellow pages like service that’s popular and widely used. Twitter has provided LBS information in the API for third-party developers for some time now. Recently they activated that feature on the Twitter web interface. Facebook will follow shortly with something bringing location into play.

Location may be the single most talked about piece of user metadata that exists today. The open discussion isn’t about location as metadata, but that’s where the value chain lies. That’s where the future is and where there’s money to be made, customers to be won, and influence to be leveraged.

What’s missing today for general adoption? The WIIFM quotient. What’s in it for me? Today, nothing. There is nothing in it for me, John or Jane Q. Public. As a member of the general population I could care less about being the mayor of McDonalds, finding a frisbee, collecting valueless influence points or any other intangible that the geek squad might think are fun. They have no value. None. As long as WIIFM = ZERO, critical mass adoption by the general population simply won’t occur. Why would it?

Just like I own my other information, I own my location. For me to share it with you, or the world, requires incentive. Incentive and time to build a new set of social behaviors. (more…)